frotz
@frotz@grenzland.club
Boring old man / Langweiliger alter Mann / 退屈な老人 / 无趣的老头
frotz
@frotz@grenzland.club
Ok, I think I'm getting in over my head on this computer problem, any help much appreciated! (Linux/Opensuse TW/KDE/btrfs)
Symptom: Everything that tries to save something to my home partition (configurations, sessions, kwallet, etc.) says that I have no space left, and thus won't work. Some programs won't even load (Vivaldi, Steam). Every file manager I have tells me that I do have space left.
History: Before this happened I had tried updating a game in Steam thinking that it would warn me if there wasn't enough room on the disk to do so (silly me). Then the whole desktop crashed and I had to restart.
Tried: 1) deleting several GB of files. I can now download files to /home, but all the other stuff still won't work.
2) running fsck from bootable flash drive. Mostly didn't do anything. Finally got it to tell me to use btrfs check instead (I am using btrfs).
3) I did that and it told me that there were errors. The only things that looked like errors was in "Checking free space tree" where it said "Space key logical (number) length (number) has no corresponding block group" twice with different numbers.
4) Not being terribly familiar with btrfs yet, I read the fine manual for btrfs check. There were lots of warnings about not trying to repair a btrfs without experienced help, else risking your volumes. So here I am.
One of those "forever discussion" rpg discussion topics is should there be a unified experience point table or individual tables customized to different classes.
And then you could dovetail into what should the progression rate be.
Feel free to reply if you have "other" ideas.
#dnd #rpg #ttrpg #osr #gametheory
| Unified XP Table: | 15 |
| Individual Class XP Table: | 5 |
Closed
@randomwizard Levels were a mistake. I prefer skill-based systems.
Edit: I didn't realize this needed to be said, but I don't actually believe the system that the most popular TTRPGs ever have used for advancement was a mistake. It's a rhetorical device to point out that sometimes the answer to "what's your favorite flavor of ice cream" might be "pie".
Also, classes were a mistake. And dice. And players.
@htugboat Argh beat me to it!!!
I agree. let the player spend xp on skills/abilities, and the referee can adjust the skill cost based on how awesome they are.
@randomwizard
Unified XP tables were introduced to D&D in the first place in order to support 3.x-style multiclassing (which 5.x also uses). It would theoretically be possible to instead do levels in a way similar to how point-buy systems do incremental advancement: instead of separate incompatible tracks or a unified XP table, you can "buy" levels of classes with XP, with the price determined by various factors.
@pteryx I never thought about why 3.x adopted unified. I always thought they did it just to reduce complexity, but the multi-classing angle makes a lot of sense.
@randomwizard As a DM I've gone away from awarding XP altogether and have characters level up when it's appropriate to the story arc. Traditional tables are too focused on killing things rather than creative problem solving and advancing the plot. I like more diverse PCs than just murder hobos.
@randomwizard I use a unified table but elves require double the xp
@kensanata But what if I want to play a hobbit fighter/thief !
@randomwizard A hobbit fighter thief is just a hobbit!
@kensanata @randomwizard I think I pushed Alex over the edge at some point regarding the XP table. I also use the fighter XP table in my unpublished B/X heartbreaker.
Difference is I add multi-classing on top because I took race classes out, and the folks with multi-class get a harder XP table. Not "double" hard like elves here, but harder.
However, I don't allow equal levels: your secondary is only half the level of your primary (rounded up). Stole that from some Castles & Crusade thing I think?
Has the nice "benefit" that fighter/thief and thief/fighter are actually different: the fighter/thief does thief-stuff on the side, the thief/fighter does fighter-stuff on the side. The fighter/thief can try to thief around in plate mail, the thief/fighter is stuck with leather armor. Fighter/"wizard" can cast in plate, "wizard"/fighter cannot. And so on. 🤷
I have "wizard" in quotes because in fact I only have one spell-caster class called "mystic" and that's whatever you want. It can be a divine thing for example, something like "priest" or whatnot. Then fighter/"priest" is paladin and "priest"/fighter is cleric-ish. 🤷
@phf That is sort of what I cam up with too, in my homebrew. The 3 classes are Fighter, Mage, Thief and tackle 3 different specialties.
Fighter - Weapons & Armor
Mage - Spellcasting
Thief - Skills
I always liked the way the hit-points work out for this kind of multi-classing. This is for level 10 characters.
https://anydice.com/program/430d1
Note that someone else helped me invent this, although I can't quite recall who that was. 🤔
EDIT: Here it is! https://nilisnotnull.blogspot.com/2013/12/hit-dice-for-archetypal-multiclassing.html I nabbed it from Hedgehobbit. No idea whether he's around on Fedi?
Alt...
Graph that shows how hit-points work out for level 10 characters of the various classes or multi-class combinations.
@kensanata@grenzland.club @randomwizard@vivaldi.net
@frotz 😬 😰 
@frotz No third class. Armor and damage according to primary. No level limits BUT the XP table never flattens out so for all intents and purposes level 12 is it. Only elves and liches can ever be archmages.
@randomwizard I use what's appropriate for the edition I'm playing. If I were to design my own game, I'd likely go with unified XP.
I don't mind having different amounts for each class from the older editions. I also like XP for treasure and magic items. I have always given XP for role play and other events in game. For example, successfully finding a secret door or disarming a trap (for a thief) / cleverly bypassing a trap (everyone).
It encourages more than just fighting.
@DM_Zeppelin Hey, that is how 2nd edition defined giving out XP!
I have played games with many different ways of doing advancement. And, like you, I try to go with the flow.
@randomwizard unified. its easier for designer. easier for dev/playtests. easier for GMs. easier for players. at end of day a TTRPG is just a game, and games meant to be fun. its already a geeky cognitive-burdening type of hobby and so the easier we can make it on our brains the better. like the brain can only handle so much complexity, so we need to impose upon it judiciously. DCC eg puts more of complexity into magic than say character creation, cuz former more fun than latter
@synlogic4242 I would probably vote unified if I voted in my own polls (which I usually do not).
Like you, I like to reduce cognitive load.
I was even going to point out that I like 1-2-5 progression for XP, instead of 2, 4, 8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_number#1%E2%80%932%E2%80%935_series
I think 1-2-5 is easier to grasp for non math people. It mirrors a lot of currency systems. BUT! I am not an expert.
@randomwizard I prefer distinct tables over unified ones due to balancing reasons. The classes are in fact very different. They have unique strengths and weaknesses and get more powerful at different 'levels" of play and therefore there should be distinct levels and caps.
In addition I am no big fan of multiclasses because it tends to overoptimizing and most of the time I make it harder for players to level them up by giving them a penalty depending on the number of classes.
I should mention that I am playing OSE (B/X) and AD&D (2nd).
#Neuromancer. Series coming to AppleTV next year. Trailer below.
Cue people bitching to high fucking Hell about Molly being played by a black woman. I hink she's perfect.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7084314/mediaviewer/rm3473063937/?ref_=nm_ov_ph
@BaronessWinter I’m pretty fucking hyped for this. The trailer was brief, but what I saw works with my memory of the book.
The haters can piss off. As long as she pulls of Molly’s attitude, I’m good.
People are so dumb.
My complaints (which I’ve seen others saying the same) were Case not looking hung over enough and the city looking way too utopia futuristic instead of dystopia futuristic.
I also wondered if the mirror shade eyes were the way the book described them because my memories were different but maybe that was me misremembering because I read the book one time 15 years ago so I probably just remember it wrong (I thought her eyes were like just normal human eyes except the eyeball was chrome but that is probably just me misremembering)
I’m kind of afraid to watch this. I have wanted a film adaptation for decades and now it’s here I’m like “is this going to ruin how I imagined this story in my head when I read it?” Because a lot of movies do that… it’s never quite the way you imagined it.
@heidi I agree; Case really should look *rough*, and the city, especially if that's supposed to be the Sprawl, needs to be a lot more 1982 Blade Runner. (I had a similar issue with Gotham in The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises.) But I think they nailed Molly -- every representation I've ever seen of her has that slightly bug-eyed chrome look for the mirrors, and her razors (which we saw for all of a split second) looked *fierce*! My big question is how they're going to handle the space end of the book, especially the Rastafarian tug pilot whose name I can't recall offhand, and Wintermute. *Especially* Wintermute.
Yeah, it has been a while since I have seen it. A coworker was telling me they think the reason this wasn’t attempted sooner was the visual effects that would be required…
Damn now I feel like I should reread it ahead of watching the series so I can tell how much they got right…
I remember a fair amount of Neuromancer but I remember almost nothing from Count Zero and Mona Lisa Overdrive, are they worth revisiting as well?
Yeah I kind of remember that and I like it. There always seems to be this temptation to keep writing about an established and liked character but Neuromancer ends with its happy ever after (as far as I recall, lol, just reading it again now) and I hate when movies and books wrap up neatly and then have to go invent some new trouble to reel back in the protagonist for another adventure.
It's funny that for all of his dystopian settings, Gibson's books tend toward happy/best outcome endings. no complaints - I like it when characters can get a little peace.
Is it just me, or do most places in the US just not have any active feedback for crosswalk buttons?
Growing up in Michigan, they'd *almost always* always give an audible "WAIT" or "WALK" and progress beeping and such..do other states just not do this??
It helps everyone, and especially helps the visually impaired.
@benrob0329 The vast majority of such buttons are not actually attached to the light system. They are placebos.
#OpinionPoll (please boost for visibility)
You find a post on the Fediverse that is not in a language you speak. You use machine translation to read it in your native language and find you would like to reply.
Should you:
| Reply in your native language: | 26 |
| Respond in a different language you're likely to both speak, such as English: | 19 |
| Machine translate from your native language to the language of the post: | 9 |
| Don't respond at all: | 19 |
| Other (please specify): | 3 |
@AVincentInSpace I feel like I've committed a serious faux pas. I'm one of those people who will translate their reply into the language of the original poster. To me, it shows I'm willing to at least make that much effort and not just assume everygoddamnbody speaks English like a typical American.
Speaking of skills. Many years ago, I attempted to write out every skill from every Gazetteer for the BECMI Basic D&D line.
This was a skill system that was bolted on to Basic. I like reading through them, because it shows a lot of the problems they encountered in designing a game with classes and adding skills later.
For example, for GAZ10 Orcs of Thar, there are no thieves. It is race as a class, so you play Goblins, Trolls.
So if you play GAZ10, there are Find Traps, Hear Noise, Hide in Shadow skills. But those skills are forbidden if you play any other Gazeteer because you do not want to infringe on the Thief class.
@frotz Sounds cool. Reminds me of Ultima Online or Morrowind.
Could probably start off with Runequest or Stormbringer but just blank out the skills and tell players that have no skills yet. At least, as a start.
@randomwizard It'll be interesting to compare this list to the RC's list.
EDIT: Nevermind, you include the RC in the big list!
I have been working on the character sheet for my 1d100 game that evolved out of AD&D and then throwing some skills in it.
It has been a lot of fun, but I have to say, players... well, the players in this game I have been running...
They really do have a problem with "clinging" too hard to what is written down on the character sheet. If you have a skill like tumbling, then that is what they will reach for.
I do not have a solution. It is one of those eternal questions that should be on a wiki page.
I know some will say, just do away with a skill list and let the player use their brains. But, I do want a system where a player can get better at particular things, not just some broad (overly broad) system where you just can do thiefy things and you get better at thiefy things. Which leads to having to write it down, which leads to players getting to hung up on that is all they can do instead of using their brains.
@randomwizard This is maybe less of a problem in systems where skills are more generic. I seem to remember in Shadowrun, you could walk the skill tree but it took dice away the further removed you got. You could always defer to an attribute for a skill you did not have. Of course if you are reckless with this it ends badly for your character. But in D&D, say, skills tend to be narrower in scope.
@frotz I remember a conversation between Mike Mearls and the two guys from Penny Arcade talking about skills and I think Jerry said something like... "Oh, it is like the character sheet is the window a player might look out of. Or a fighter pilot looking at his controls. It can limit what you think about"
And I think that is what happens to the players lately. In the game I have been running.
Die Bestellfrist für Grenzland 8 läuft noch bis 31. Juli!
#grenzland #pnpde #ttrpg #fanzine
Alt...
Ad for issue 8 of the Grenzland ttrpg fanzine. The cover mockup shown looks suspiciously similar to a famous 2d6 sci-fi role playing game. The table of contents lists: The original tabletop role playing dice mechanic, The Space Empire of Alexander the Great, Seven Patrons, The Cover Game, Reflections on Traumstein, Sword World, Warum 2W6 Spiele?, Leviathan, Welcome to grenzland.club, Classifieds, Feedback, Save the Date!, Outlook, Imprint
PDFs of all back issues are available here: https://lkh.sdf-eu.org/wandererbill/grenzland/
Yesterday, the dumbest ai/llms human interactions occurred at an executive meeting at where I worked.
One sub-executive presented a new proposal to buy a new 3rd party service to make a process perform better. The proposal was obvious AI slop.
Then another executive put some things into an AI, right there, in the meeting, looking at his laptop and said "Well this is saying you already have too many 3rd party programs in this process and it is causing too many integration issues and that is why the current process is not working well"
And an argument broke out about which AI was right.
*I should note, that I hate typing the letters AI to denote the llms, but that is the term humankind decided to go with.
@randomwizard Business idea! AI Duel - settle disputes by combat! We generate gladiatorial avatars from the specs of your LLMs and pit them against each other.
"My AI can beat up your AI..."? Prove it!
with a straight face.
...and all of this is at the management level... Wowsers...
Apparently in the 80s everyone in the UK dressed as if they could be picked as a new Dr. Who incarnation any minute.
@mhd more data points... Adam Ant.
I have a sudden interest in ice tea. Yes, ice tea, not Ice-T, although he's my homie. 🤣 And not ICE tea because they can fuck the fuck off. 👿
So ... what's best?
Feel free to comment and suggest flavors I have not listed but ONLY if you ACTUALLY drink those regularly. And yes, this is about MAKING your own ice tea, not buying ice tea off the shelf.
#IceTea #WhatsInYourChilledGlass #BeatTheHeat #BoostsWelcome
| Lemon: | 2 |
| Orange: | 1 |
| Apricot: | 2 |
| Peppermint: | 1 |
| I'm not sharing my ice tea secrets!: | 1 |
Closed
Ah, I posted this from my #ttrpg account. So please imagine that I asked "Conan, what flavor tea is best in a chilled mug?" instead. ⚔️
@phf PRUNE IS A WARRIOR'S DRINK!
@phf Iced tea, with a "d", friendo. The tea itself is not ice. Also: orange mafia, represent! (The others are good, too.)
@BaronessWinter You know, I was debating the "ice" vs "iced" thing. I guess I've been in Germany for too long. 😆
@frotz Giving orange and ginger a try, those are two flavors I had in the pantry. Will report back! 😀
@frotz The "orange + ginger" variant I cooked up didn't convince me but that's PROBABLY mostly because I am not really a big ginger person. So as of right now, I am still alternating orange flavor and peppermint. Next shopping trip will include some lemon flavor and some green tea as well. More experiments!! 🤪
@frotz Don't get me started on Oma's tea. That always had some rum in it. Delicious for a little boy! 😵💫 🥴 😊
If you take the various 80s TSR task resolution charts and try to normalize them to compare, you get the following set of images. By normalize, I mean I just converted them all to roll low, percent chances.
The chart based games had "bounded accuracy" long before Mike Mearls came up with the term.
Still, to my mind, Marvel, Gamma World, Star Frontiers Zebulon, TSR Conan are all just providing "degrees of success" with different chance to achieve different degrees. (Image 1 and 2)
How the designer drew the various lines of percentages just seems to be make an increasing line by whatever whim struck them at the time.
If you try to convert D&D to a chart, you end up with a pretty bland chart. (Image 3)
Alternity did not have a chart either, but it had "degrees of success" by implementing a very simple mathematical formula to compute degrees of success. If you convert the chances to a chart, it looks like all the old 80s TSR charts. (Image 3)
I worked out these charts ~15 years ago, but decided to do them again and add some more data of games I missed.
#dnd #rpg #ttrpg #osr #gametheory
@frotz It has been a long time since I have run FASERIP, but I do recall enjoying trying to interpret all the degrees of success. Made it feel like an over the top wrestling match.
However, I also recall it can get a bit tiring trying to interpret things all the time. And it adds up more options for the GM to move the needle for or against the players (which I do not like myself).
Hey! Did you know that the trans voice training app we worked on as UX/UI lead is out now and you can use it on your phone or in the browser?
https://transvoice.app/
Please boost. If we get enough interest it'll be easier to secure more funding for the project and we can keep working on it. Otherwise our work contract may run out at the end of the month, which would suck
Alt...
smartphone shows the dashboard of the trans voice app, with UI elements, a small shark mascot, community trends, and practice-time stats. two white floating cards hover in front: one displays a pitch monitor graph with voice pitch over time, and the other shows a community voting interface with an audio waveform and a gender-perception scale from masculine to feminine
@randomwizard Yes and as many as they can afford to buy, feed, house, and control. Once there's more than a few in a party, however, the burden they bring outweighs the benefit. They bark and play, causing noise, for example. They aren't allowed in most inns, too. So, the issues usually control the number of them in a party for me.
But I'd never say "you can't have more than X dogs in the party".
@DM_Zeppelin Fair take. Same, I can not imagine me saying "a party can only have X dogs"
But, in my current campaign, I do not think any of the villages even have a place where you can go buy a war dog. So there is that kind of "no war dogs".
Just interesting to think about. Is the world one where there are so many adventurers that there is an industry to sell them war dogs? Sort of like the idea that there is a shop that will sell you a ten foot pole.
@randomwizard Agreed. There are a lot of ways to limit things beyond just saying "no."
And, it is a fun thought experiment. That's world building, too.
@randomwizard war dogs take a follower slot, so base 4 + charisma bonus (cha 18 means +3) so 7 is the maximum.
@randomwizard I mean, they can of course buy more but they have no mechanical effect.
Have you ever ran a game where a player had 4 or 5 or more hirelings? Just curious because it sounds awful to my mind, just the way my mind works, not as in it is bad for others. I mean, maybe I could handle it if it were 1 player with 5 hirelings, maybe.
Fair enough. I can see you two like to incorporate some mechanical rules into the situation. Hireling rules is one of those things I never used in my game, but that is not because I think it is a bad rule, just I am lazy and I tend to wing such things. Although, as I mentioned in another thread, I have not had a shop with a war dog for sale in many years. Probably in the 00s was the last time a war dog was available.
@randomwizard
Players can buy any animals they can afford and vet. But each animal gets a random action each morning and afternoon (each one is unique) so having too many isn't advisable.
@randomwizard Animals in my PCs party are subject to morale and reaction checks, just like hirelings. I've even done it to horses if they face a fantastic creature. Those checks have a way of thinning things out.
I’m listening to Swiss news about events a few years in the past and it’s sad to see how much has failed, big and small.
Just now, however, they’re talking about the protests against Lukashenko’s “reelection” in Byelorussia. Remember the hundreds of thousands on the streets? And he’s still there. The journalist just said that he probably had the support of 30% of the population.
Remember this number when you see that a fascist party in your country didn’t make it to power because they only got 30% of the vote. Once they get into power, they’ll manage to suppress the remaining 70% for a lifetime.
The time to act against the fascist parties is now.
I am not a big fan of D&D clerics, so I took them out of my little homebrew. The setting is more like Lord of the Rings than a typical D&D setting.
Instead there is a first aid skill.
But, the problem is, everyone clamours to get first aid. I mean, why not? It is one of the most powerful skills in a game where you take damage.
I just do not know what to think of it. Are adventurers more like combat soldiers? Do combat soldiers get a six week course in First Aid?
I lean more to "No". This is a medieval setting. The characters that have a first aid skill would be wizards and the old wise woman who lurks in the forest and everyone says is a witch but really just knows more than most peasants.
@randomwizard IDK, man... for me, I would go back to the OD&D class names - a 1st level fighter is a veteran. I agree with the CM/OD&D assertion that adventurers are a bit different than "normal people" in both experience and drive. I would imagine a "veteran" probably has learned a bit of combat and wilderness first aid. Even in medieval settings?
@randomwizard Depends on how common skills are. I mean, in GURPS it wasn't uncommon for everyone to have First-Aid and "Hiking", ferchrissakes. But then again, you also had a few dozen other skills, it didn't really preclude characters from having other skills. Which is what happens in most D&D skill systems.
If it's something everyone wants to have in such games, then frack it, let everyone do it without an investment, put it elsewhere. Herbs are a classic choice. Need to be fresh, so no stocking up on 'em, and thus it's a time constraint: I can speed up healing or be safe for the next bleeding out roll, but that'll take me one or more days.
For harder stuff I did something in my cleric-less games that turned out to be quite close to the "demi-human relics" from the Rules Cyclopedia, just for regular temples: Spells as features of holy sites, not holy people (and you can borrow a spell, but it doesn't recharge and the nice priests would really like the Toe Bone of Skorrn the Smasher back soon)
@mhd I got to admit that my knowledge of GURPs and healing has left my brain. I imagine there are like 20 ways of doing healing but it depends on setting.
@randomwizard Yes, healing varies wildly, but First Aid is still very common in most campaigns I saw as it doesn't really cost you all that much. After a fight, you get 1 HP back just for bandaging, no skill roll needed. Then you can treat shock and with a successful First Aid roll you get back points based on the Tech Level, so for fantasy campaigns usually 1d6-3 points, minimum 1. That won't solve all your healing issues, but it's not bad. And IIRC, a single point gets you First Aid at your IQ level, so even Joe Average has a 50% chance of 1-3 extra HP restored, if the high-IQ co-adventurer isn't there. Way worse spots of spending a point.
But again, this is the game where you might take three different skills of stealing stuff, a plethora of sciences in a sci-fi campaign etc., you're pretty much made of skills. D&D tends to be much more about exceptional abilities, niches etc., so I don't think a First Aid proficiency/skill makes sense, nor does everyone taking 1 level/rank in Heal, even if they're veterans. Heck, if the game is that harsh and preventing fellow adventurers from bleeding out all the time like it's X-Com, I'd niche-protect this even more. At least join the resistance to learn it then ;)
@mhd Right. That is the dilema. Everyone wants first aid. Should I let everyone have it, or should it be more like a witch, scholar, wizard only skill.
I suppose I could make it where it costs a lot more unless you are a wizard, but then I was trying to avoid too much complexity.
Strangely, in the game, so far, it only takes one character with first aid to go around after a battle and heal up people. It sounds it is a lot like the GURPs rules you described.
But, still, everyone in the group wants first aid, just in case.
@randomwizard What system is this? AD&D's proficiencies? How many skill options do I have? Maybe part of the solution is making the other options more interesting.
I also don't even like the phrase "First Aid" in a fantasy setting. Is it named that? Is Heal/Physician something else?
@randomwizard I played without clerics a few times (I don't like "divine magic" at all), but that usually didn't involve skills, so the stop-gaps where always something else. Most of the time just wizards having access to Cure spells, as it should be ;)
I'd just give stop bleeding/stabilize/etc. out for free, but maybe demand some investment for long-term care and diseases. So, sure, you can pick that one rank of "Healing Person", but that means you can take care of one patient a day (not yourself, of course), and cure the sniffles. Maybe.
@mhd Let me query your GURPs knowledge, if you do not mind.
Does GURPs give any alternate name for "First Aid" if you are playing a low tech game?
I was toying with the idea of Chirurgery for "has some skill with dealing with wounds"
which is something I first saw when reading Pendragon long ago.
@mhd Wow. I do not want to bore the internet with my homebrew skill system.
I agree, first aid is a poor name.
The skill system is, probably, mostly, like Runequest or maybe a Fantasy version of Star Frontiers.
They start out with some skills based on a Archetype, then they gets points as they level up.
I have a feeling you would pick it apart in no time flat and tell me to go play GURPs.
@randomwizard
Speaking of witches and healing, might be worth scoping out and simplifying something like the Pathfinder 1e Witch into something more old-school D&D-like.
@randomwizard Whats the problem with the cleric? If it is "just" lorewise you could easily change that instead of changing a system that is already balanced in a specific way.
On the other Hand: Let them learn the healing skill and make sure damage taken is not the only threat in your game.
@FrankBlack78 Just a flavor thing mostly. Not really clerics in Middle-earth for example.
@randomwizard There are no (D&D-like)Wizards in middle earth as well. Did you ban them too?
@FrankBlack78 Fair enough. Maybe the game has drifted far enough away that it is not really D&D any more.
@randomwizard I would say: If you want to stay true to the original, play the original e.g. The One Ring, MERS or Rolemaster or something like that.
If not, don't worry too much about it. You could ban the cleric but instead of making healing available for everbody just tweak the cleric to get rid of the religious context. That keeps the game balance as it was intended.
Do you use 5E? Because if you do, I wouldn't worry about healing too much. You can get rid of the cleric no matter what without replacing it with a healing skill. PCs almost always never die in that game anyway.
@e_eric@grenzland.club
@kensanata actually like this a lot. Takes the homework aspect out of the game (= good for spontaneous games e.g. at open tables) and introduces a layer of necessary PC-NPC interaction which increases social embeddedness of MUs - this does something interesting with the setting! Trade-off is an decrease of tactical flexibility on the player‘s side. Was this the point of complaint?
How about moving the issue inside of the game world? Would there be an in character price to pay to magically gain the capacity to memorize multiple spells? Would said characer be willing to pay this price? (probably somewhere on the order of selling one's soul)
CC: @kensanata@tabletop.social
CC: @lkh@grenzland.club @frotz@mastodon.sdf.org @phf@tabletop.social @alex@grenzland.club
🇨🇦
