grenzland.club is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Search results for tag #fediverse

witchescauldron »
@witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

The are designed for greed and selfishness. Everything about them feeds this, and in turn feeds off it. It is coded deep into their closed networks.

They cannot be fixed. And we can't build alternatives by copying the same models in , as we have largely done with the .

Rebooting the was the right first step, and it worked. But the next step is to move beyond simply copying the current mess.

The next step needs to be native to the path we have started down.

Let's thank the people who copied. Give them statues and security! They did us all a service and deserve thanks, not hatred. They helped get us this far.

Now we need to look for the next path: a genuinely humanistic approach to social technology.

Who's coming on the adventure with ?

    witchescauldron »
    @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

    How do we talk to people on the without feeding their

    Sarcasm and comedy can be useful ways of exposing the absurdity of the platforms controlling our communication and communities. But there is a problem: every click, argument and outrage still feeds the with attention and data.

    The challenge is to help people understand that we can build healthier social relationships on the , where communities grow their communication, data and infrastructure. So the answer isn't to spend all our time mocking the cage. The path is to step away from the cage - and take your community with you.

    Don't just ridicule the , please build the alternatives.

      witchescauldron »
      @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

      – What actually happened (no bullshit version) hamishcampbell.com/fediverse-w A few years ago, the liberation cats of the stopped talking to each other.

        Glorrion »
        @Glorrion@nrw.social

        @ralf Hey, willkommen im bei den coolen Kids! 😎👍

          Baroness Winter »
          @BaronessWinter@beige.party

          folks, doing up your isn't really that hard. A few pertinent, salient details about yourself to tell curious folks whether following you would be a good idea for them, and maybe some strong tags; that's all it really takes.

          You can be verbose as hell and give as close to a full autobiography as character limits on your instance will allow if you so choose, and that's hot, but come on. A single-sentence quip with a couple vague tags doesn't help any more than leaving your profile blank. Some interests, your pronouns, an advisory about if your posts disappear or if you don't post images without alt-text. We're here to mesh and mingle. Please, make an effort.

            Tomáš boosted

            Stefano Marinelli »
            @stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe

            Another step closer to release!

            The official website is now live at littlefedi.org/ with documentation and project details.

            Take a look and let me know what you think!

              witchescauldron »
              @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

              A little reminder, when an projects gets flooded with conspiracy, dogma and endless prat fights, the grounded, constructive people drift away - sometimes straight back to the .

              Being independent doesn't mean believing everything. Being radical doesn't mean shutting down dialogue. Let's make spaces where people can think, disagree, learn and still build things together.

                Tomáš »
                @prahou@merveilles.town

                THEODORE ROOSEVELT SHOT BY CRANK IN MILWAUKEE STREET

                Funhole Content Review
FEDIVERSE

I HAVE A DREAM

'you need to enable javascript to run this this app.'

How to make it big? You don't

@mmtmm pls sponsor me

How to get more boosts? Cats.

so many rabbits

LOOPY CONSPIRACY - Who is behind the manufactured fame of a tiktok clone nobody asked for?

THE C BANSHEE: What is snac and should you be worried?

FEDIVERSE MENACE: HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN?

hackers.town: Is nowhere safe?

ONE FREE ANTI-SLOP KITTO

THE LIST: 50.000 mastodon addresses to avoid if you don't like illegal content.

                Alt...Funhole Content Review FEDIVERSE I HAVE A DREAM 'you need to enable javascript to run this this app.' How to make it big? You don't @mmtmm pls sponsor me How to get more boosts? Cats. so many rabbits LOOPY CONSPIRACY - Who is behind the manufactured fame of a tiktok clone nobody asked for? THE C BANSHEE: What is snac and should you be worried? FEDIVERSE MENACE: HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN? hackers.town: Is nowhere safe? ONE FREE ANTI-SLOP KITTO THE LIST: 50.000 mastodon addresses to avoid if you don't like illegal content.

                  Neko »
                  @Neko0001@eldritch.cafe

                  BONJOUR LE
                  ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜❤️🧡💛💚💙💜

                    Jürgen Hubert »
                    @juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                    RE: wandering.shop/@mythologymonda

                    If you haven't followed @mythologymonday yet, follow them for fascinating themes like this one.

                    They are the only -themed "Hashtag Day" organizer who has fully committed to the !

                      witchescauldron »
                      @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                      The matters because the needs better ways to have trust-based conversations and trust-based governance.

                      The project comes from years of grassroots organising: voluntary cooperation, collaboration and human-scale decision-making.

                      Alternative tech has often copied governance assumptions from the . The offers a simpler starting point for building governance structures native to the .

                      The is a path to move beyond : governance that fits the culture of federated, open, grassroots networks rather than forcing them into centralised models.

                        hamish campbell »
                        @hamishcampbell@mastodon.social

                        The is a simple path with a radical aim: to shift power away from the and the , and back to the people who actually create media and build communities.

                        From that grassroots digital commons, new social, economic and cultural ecosystems can grow. The tools redistribute power. What we do with that power is up to us.

                          nieebel boosted

                          padeluun ⁂ »
                          @padeluun@digitalcourage.social

                          Save Social sucht Verstärkung!

                          Du willst dazu beitragen, dass soziale Netzwerke wieder den Menschen dienen statt den Plattformkonzernen? Dann könnte das genau die richtige Stelle für dich sein.

                          Save Social sucht Unterstützung im Bereich Kommunikation. Wenn du Lust auf Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, Kampagnen, Social Media und digitale Zivilgesellschaft hast, schau dir die Ausschreibung an und bewirb dich:

                          savesocial.eu/wp-content/uploa

                          Bitte weitersagen – gute Leute für gute Projekte werden immer gebraucht.

                          Tim_Eagon »
                          @Tim_Eagon@dice.camp

                          I was reading a thread on Reddit bemoaning how every website has gotten progressively worse, and I’m thinking, my Mastodon instance’s software has only gotten better and new features are getting added regularly, all without them selling my data, manipulating me with algorithms, or shoving endless ads in my face (amongst other things). I see similar activity on other instances and Fediverse platforms. So, there is another way, now there only has to be the will to follow it.

                            witchescauldron »
                            @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                            The isn't just about connecting software, it's about connecting communities. The technology matters, but people matter more. Federation isn't simply a protocol, it's a way for diverse communities to cooperate while keeping their autonomy.

                            Build community first. The software follows.

                            hamishcampbell.com/tag/fediver

                              witchescauldron »
                              @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                              All startups are expressions of the . Every is, in effect, a bishop preaching endless growth, extraction and enclosure.

                              This isn't innovation. It's a business model accelerating social breakdown, deepening inequality, and feeding the that will displace billions and cost millions of lives over the coming century.

                              If you're serious about activism, stop feeding the machine. Put your energy into building the commons instead.

                              opencollective.com/open-media-

                                witchescauldron »
                                @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                The is a simple, practical tool to evaluate and guide grassroots, alternative tech projects. It judges how "open" and trustworthy a project is, helping to distinguish native efforts from or captured ones (e.g., like corporate social media).

                                The Four Opens

                                * Open Data - The basic truth of the project. Data (content, metadata, etc.) should be openly accessible and exportable/portable. This prevents lock-in and enables sharing, archiving, and reuse by communities.

                                * Open Source - The code (or equivalent for non-software projects) is publicly available under a free/open license. This allows inspection, modification, and forking, embodying principles but integrated into a wider social context.

                                * Open Standards - The project uses (and contributes to) interoperable, non-proprietary standards. This supports federation, compatibility across tools/instances, and avoids silos (e.g., in the ).

                                Open Process (the critical addition) - Transparent, participatory decision-making and governance. This is not just technical openness but social openness: how the project is run, how power is handled, how feedback shapes direction, and how it avoids hidden hierarchies or -style capture. It emphasizes trust-building, commons-oriented culture, and composting conflicts through visible, inclusive processes.

                                How this works in practice
                                Badging system (simple and motivational):
                                * 2 opens: Bronze badge (basic alt/grassroots alignment).
                                * 3 opens: Silver badge.
                                * 4 opens: Gold badge (full native project).

                                Projects self-assess and are evaluated by the community using these criteria. It's designed to be (Keep It Simple, Stupid) - easy to apply without bureaucracy.

                                It acts as a compass for vs. . Use it to judge value, compost /#techchurn, resist enclosure, and build trust-based digital commons. It's explicitly a social restating/extension of paths, adding the missing social layer () that pure technical openness often lacks.

                                Only technical openness (e.g., open source + data) still leads to outcomes, meritocracy, fragmentation ("just fork it"), or capture by careerists/#fashionistas if process and culture are closed.

                                The prioritizes human-centred, trust-based infrastructure over scale, funding, or individual exit. This supports horizontal activism, mutual aid, and decentralized organizing (e.g., in history or current efforts).

                                Examples: Mastodon (when aligned) can score high; corporate platforms like Facebook score low across the board. It helps grow networks where communities own their storytelling, governance, and tools.

                                The framework is not rigid dogma but a living tool for "composting the mess" - turning failed and captured projects into fertile ground for better ones. It's central to projects, which are working on building federated, grassroots media and social infrastructure.

                                To sum up, it’s a powerful, low-overhead way to keep tech aligned with grassroots values rather than drifting into or logics of extraction and control.

                                  Glorrion boosted

                                  derlemue ツ »
                                  @derlemue@social.penzberg.me

                                  Jo ,
                                  ich bräuchte etwas Unterstützung. Ich werde morgen Nacht, vorher schaffe ich es nicht, aufgrund eines familiären Schicksalsschlages bis auf weiteres in Stellung beziehen. Um da zu sein für jemanden der immer da war. Und jetzt 2:30 Stunden entfernt von der Kernfamilie „verlegt“ alleine ist nachts.

                                  Und ich suche keine Bleibe, kein Zimmer nichts. Ich und mein Bus. Wenn ich irgendwo schlafen und verarbeiten kann, dann dort. Wir stehen irgendwo. Darum geht es auch nicht.

                                  Es geht darum mal einen Wasserkanister aufzufüllen, eine Trommel Wäsche für nen Fünfer waschen - nehm ich nass mit. Sowas.

                                  Meint ihr @fediverse das da was zamginge?

                                  Es findet statt - so oder so - kriegen wir bisschen Support obendrauf hin?

                                  Ich schreibe i.d.R. nur Scheiße.

                                  Diesmal ist es mir, ganz persönlich, ernst.

                                  Edit:
                                  Einfach ganz unverbindlich ne PM hier oder per Matrix: derlemue@penzberg.me

                                  Würde mich melden - und wenns dann akut nicht passt ist’s auch ok.

                                  Dann ist’s komplizierter aber ich komm schon auch zurecht.

                                    SDF.ORG »
                                    @SDF@mastodon.sdf.org

                                    Welcome to v4.6.3

                                      hamish campbell »
                                      @hamishcampbell@mastodon.social

                                      Definitions should stay flexible. Turning them into rigid rules is a classic that creates unnecessary conflict.

                                      The is a vibrant, active project - currently one of the healthiest examples of this "native" path.

                                      That's why the rely on openness, interpretation, and good judgment - not dogma.

                                        witchescauldron »
                                        @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                        The old wasn't destroyed by one thing, but by many. The security theatre, broken and trustless relationships. The turned living communities into technical subcultures. The chased novelty, status and hype. The enclosed our data and metadata for profit and social control.

                                        Each played a part. The is a first step in rebooting the . But we need to stop copying old mistakes and grow "native" alternatives based on community, trust and the .

                                        That's the path is building.

                                          hamish campbell »
                                          @hamishcampbell@mastodon.social

                                          Your viral lefty memes might feel like resistance, but their part of the problem.

                                          Comedy and sarcasm drive engagement, clicks, data collection and on the ad revenue. Mocking the system while feeding its algorithms doesn't weaken it - it strengthens it.

                                          Real resistance isn't better content for their platforms. It's building and moving to the .

                                          , and bring your community with you.

                                            witchescauldron »
                                            @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                            With there is no path toward stricter governance. The goal is native governance that grows from the community itself.

                                            Likewise, is, by its nature, one of the largest anti-market experiments in existence. The market-first approach belongs more to "open source", which has spent decades trying to reconcile itself with commercial priorities.

                                            Ideas based on force, control, and top-down management simply don't fit the native path. They're asking the wrong questions.

                                            The challenge isn't how to control communities. It's how to help them organise themselves through trust, transparency, and the .

                                              witchescauldron »
                                              @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                              @bob

                                              implementations are still too stuck in the and attempt to change this have failed so far. We tried outreaching the simplest implementation and we failed.

                                              is a big compromise, but you can get people to use it - but It's still hard to get people to keep using it. So this is still half fail too for out reach.

                                              @esoteric_programmer

                                              These are as much social statements as much as tech.

                                              Chat is a mess, and we are currently not making this better

                                              The is fab, but we are letting the and chattering classes take charge... it's a recurring problem that we should be socially working to compost.

                                              hamishcampbell.com/online-chat

                                                witchescauldron »
                                                @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                                @murdoc

                                                Add this to the last article: hy Stories Matter on the

                                                Facts matter, technology matters, governance matters. But people rarely change because they read theory, a specification or a list of features. People change because of stories, this is why storytelling is central to the path. A story gives people somewhere to stand, it connects ideas to lived experience.

                                                Instead of explaining the as an abstract framework, tell the story of a community escaping a platform by building trust on the . Instead of arguing about governance, tell the story of how a group solved a conflict through . Instead of listing technical features, tell the story of someone who regained control of their community tech after years of platform lock-in.

                                                Stories carry values, the last forty years of have been held together by stories about competition, consumption and individual success. These stories have normalised the , making extraction and enclosure feel like "common sense." We now need better stories about cooperation instead of competition, commons balancing ownership, about trust instead of surveillance. Stories about building rather than consuming.

                                                The itself is a story, an accidental reboot of the that proves another internet is possible. It isn't perfect, but it demonstrates that people can build social infrastructure without billionaires directing the conversation.

                                                The challenge is that the academics or the tell stories only to other, academics or geeks, technical and academic paths are important, but they don't inspire people to act, so we need stories that people can understand:

                                                A neighbourhood rebuilding local media.

                                                Boaters organising to defend the waterways as a commons.

                                                Communities escaping the .

                                                Volunteers composting into useful tools.

                                                Ordinary people discovering that they can build infrastructure together.

                                                These stories become shared memory, shared memory becomes culture, culture shapes "common sense." and changing common sense is how lasting social change happens. So don't just build software or academic theory, tell stories that help people imagine themselves as part of a healthier .

                                                hamishcampbell.com/why-foss-ma

                                                  witchescauldron »
                                                  @witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                                  One of our mistakes is treating every project as if it were native .

                                                  Too often, grassroots ideas are picked up, systematised, and reshaped into something acceptable to institutions. The tools may remain "open", but the social process and governance shift.

                                                  The shows both sides of this. It has revived the , but it also carries the assumptions of the wider culture. Without care, we reproduce the same hierarchies, gatekeeping, and we were trying to escape.

                                                  The answer isn't rejection, it's composting, use the to ask simple questions:

                                                  Is the data open? Is the code open? Are the standards open? Most importantly, is the process open?

                                                  If not, we're probably looking at another layer of rather than genuine commons. Let's balance the repeating inherited agendas and start building native grassroots alternatives please.

                                                    SDF boosted

                                                    SDF.ORG »
                                                    @SDF@mastodon.sdf.org

                                                    Here are a few folks to follow!

                                                    @mntmn - Regular MNT updates
                                                    @netbsd - NetBSD Foundation (free unix-like portable OS)
                                                    @Aphelion - Prolific Poet: Michelle
                                                    @icm - Interim Computer Museum (Seattle)
                                                    @lardmotel - Tom Ellard Severed Heads, synths, rabbits
                                                    @interlisp - Medley Interslip Project



                                                    Please note that @icm is a non-profit charity affiliated with SDF.ORG

                                                      Back to top - More...